Originally posted by OoKU 24 in the future.
Is 24 what you wish for or do you know something that I don't know? I'd hope for a 35...
Originally posted by house My guess is that the high contrast light and black dress are chosen to show fringing performance. There are a lot of highlights and high contrast edges in that photo but no fringing. It's a "messy" somewhat decadent look but i does show the lens performance.
---------- Post added 05-29-20 at 12:28 AM ----------
Wonder what happens when you pixelshift a lens like that. Despite having done quite a bit of pixelshift I haven't decided if good or average lenses improve the most.
If that's unretouched and how it comes sooc, then I am really impressed. Even on the highlights on the ring there are no noticable off-colours. (pic 02)
For pixelshift I think both benefit from it. However, the lower end of lenses don't really. There has to be a certain sharpness & quality level beyond what the sensor pixel layout can do if you don't use pixelshift. I think the 24-70 does benefit from pixelshift. However, if you have a lens where the sharpest area is still blurry across 2 or 3 pixels, we will get that blur pixelshifted but won't see improved sharpness. But still I like pixelshift for better colour accuracy as well.