Originally posted by normhead Reinforcing my thought, only buy pro equipment if it can pay for itself. It's pretty steep for a hobby item.
Originally posted by Kevin B123 It's all relative.
Originally posted by Wheatfield Pentax is no longer about decent gear at lowball prices. It's looking more and more that Pentax is top tier stuff at the top end of the price range.We are getting better than Zeiss Otis quality at well under half the price though.
I think we all have individual motivations for buying -- or not buying -- certain items.
While the price of the new-gen 85 might seem steep or unaffordable to some folks, others might be quite comfortable with it. Personally, I don't think I need it (or
want it), because I can't imagine that I would use it a lot for my style of photography, and I'm not sure that I could exploit its strengths fully. My mint S-M-C Takumar 85/1.8 or my DA* 50-135 will probably continue to serve my needs at that focal length.
On the other hand, perhaps if I started shooting with the new 85, beautiful models would appear in front of me on every photo outing, and I would get published on the fashion covers.
Still, I'm mighty impressed by its potential for those folks who will shoot with it. Looking forward to the first images from the field.
In Canada, several other lenses also command a relatively high price at the moment:
- DA 560/5.6: CAD $5500-6000
- D FA* 70-200: $2200
- 150-450: $2700.
As an amateur photographer (keen, mind you),
I ask myself:
- Would this lens dramatically affect the outcomes of my photography?
- Would I get more enjoyment out of my hobby?
- Would my skills improve?
- Or, for the same cost, would I be better off to invest in half a dozen short courses at our local photography school?
It's all relative, of course. I just acquired Affinity Photo at the amazing low price of CAD $40, and will be concentrating on improving my post-processing knowledge and skills.
- Craig