Originally posted by JPT I don't know who John Bloomfield is actually, but that opinion is a bit daft. The K-3 Mark III shows that Ricoh have indeed invested heavily in R&D, but I guess that was not clear at the moment the J-Limited was announced for CP+ 2021. What I find strange is that the K-3 Mark III was not announced at CP+, but the J-Limited and FA limited HD versions were. Then when you look at availability, the K-3 Mark III was actually on the shelves on April 23, while the others were not until April 30. I guess they were dealing with some real uncertainly about whether K-3 Mark III production could go ahead at that time.
Mr Bloomfield is a self appointed reviewer with a small following. He has done some good videos, he did a very good review of the 50-200 (which I like) but his comparison of the K1 & A7iii had a distinct lean, hardly surprising as he announced at the end that he was off to Sony. (I do hope his shutter didn't fail). The video in question was very down on Pentax, a point he refused to accept despite saying (after the announced delay) that the K3iii wouldn't be out until the end of the year, if at all, and the HD FA limiteds were a cheap rehash by a company on its uppers. He was particularly scathing about the 31mm. I presume he is still under the illusion that it was a balanced and justified report. I don't mind criticism if its balanced, considered or justified, I just can't be doing with petty digs and clickbait