Originally posted by Rondec Please don't call Adam "fat."
I do wonder if some of the wondrous lenses from the past -- things like the FA 200 macro, or A* 135 will be well represented in this sort of a contest. Those would be lenses I would tend to vote for, having seen output from them, but they aren't the sort of lenses I have access to to use in this sort of a contest.
That's part of what makes the contest so intriguing...
The most "wondrous" lenses tend to be rare, so unlikely to have many people who've actually shot with them.
Even then, how many of those FA 200 macros and A* 135s are collected and unused on shelves?
The less "wondrous" lenses have better numbers... but less special about the lenses themselves...
It may just come down to being more about how well we represent our favorite lenses... and less about the lenses... and I think that's OK...
-Eric