Originally posted by Kunzite Apparently, he has no clue about the K-3 Mark III and doesn't even care if there is one.
Photography forums are full of misnomers. I guess that's because cameras are too complicated for the average technically illiterate consumer to just decode inflated marketing promotion. Personally, I have to be very carreful about what I read in product review, because sometimes what I read is totally wrong. For instance, DPR posted a review update for the Panasonic S5 with the title "
Top-notch high-res mode: Panasonic Lumix S5 review update" , which simple doesn't even fare as well as a Pentax K1 single shot, the 96Mpixels pixel shift of the S5 is just empty mega pixels, if I compare a K1 PS upsized to 96Mpixels, the K1 resolves more, BUT DPReview present the S5 high resolution mode as excellent, while they barely considered the K1 and even presented Pentax pixel shift as a "not working" feature. All this poor marketing is mostly rubbish. If I'd have to stop at every camera evaluation that is actually wrong, it'd be a never ending story. I just get the raw files and do my own comparisons, and draw my own conclusions, as opposed to relying on online reviews that are mostly sponsored (and biased) reviews.