Originally posted by borisII I suppose Sigma DP3 Quattro was not successful camera.
I guess Ricoh is seeing the GRs as stand-alone cameras, having either the III or the IIIx, since as part of a system, 45-50mm equivalence would have made more sense besides the 28mm.
I don't know about the Quattro, but the DP3 Merrill (its predecessor) was a very, very nice camera. I had the DP2 and 3 (45 / 70mm) and often wondered whether to get the DP1 (28mm) also (that was deemed to be slightly inferior apparently). With the GR III and IIIX a combo is still possible but they're quite close, not sure whether I'd do that. With 45-50mm I would be more tempted. (Now I still am but also considering the 16-50mm PLM... can't have it all.)
Obviously, The GR is even smaller than the DPs were. Also more expensive though.