Originally posted by reh321 I don’t know, but we have been told this over and over - and it does seem to explain some things.
The one thing I can think of is that Japanese photographers may be less willing to perform endless “PP”, which might explain why Pentax is so willing to use ‘accelerator’ technology even though there are so many cries from Western users for some mechanism to disable it.
I see. You probably have a point here. There do seem to be more Japanese users who prefer to get desired results in camera as opposed to a RAW+PP workflow. Basically, a lot of Japanese people don't have an up-to-date computer in their home any more, content to use a smartphone or tablet. I always get the feeling that a lot of Japanese people never liked PCs in the first place, only used them out of necessity and now have the option to just not use them at all outside their work.
However, it's interesting that when I attended a presentation by the Pentax engineer in charge of image processing, one of the first questions from the Japanese audience was "Why can't the accelerator be disabled?", so clearly some Japanese users have the same concerns. I don't think these preferences divide neatly along cultural lines.
Overall, I think people make too much of the fact that all the camera makers are Japanese. When I hear things like "28mm is such a Japanese focal length" (which I know you are not saying here), I just wonder where this comes from. Fundamentally, I don't think that by being close to Japanese customers - an unfortunate consequence of their reduced scale - Pentax will come to significantly different decisions about the products they make.
For what it's worth, I do think that Ricoh Imaging as a whole makes an effort to put good English-language content on their Japanese site to make up for their lack of international presence. It's actually more than what other makers do on their Japan sites, perhaps because those companies can rely more on their local subsidiaries to do the marketing.