Originally posted by jeremy_c I don't mind if they appeal to other markets, but I bought Pentax for IQ, $$$ and lenses. If they begin to focus on Walmart and forget advanced/professional photographers, I am going to be highly disappointed. Sure, my K20D is fantastic now, but in 3 years it will not compare to the Canon/Nikon cameras.
Jeremy
Using the previous Wii analogy, it wouldn't have went anywhere if the games weren't fun.
Pentax would be awfully foolish to neglect solid technical attributes.
But I'd bet a shiny nickel that Canon makes most of its profits on Digital Rebel XTi extreme super digital III stuff they sell to the consuming public.
It's no accident that 90% of the shots on flicker are shot on the above Canon Hyperbole that doesn't even have spot metering. (or at least it didn't use to) And the kit lenses they market are pretty sad things compared to what the K2000 comes with.
http://www.flickr.com/cameras/
Anyhow, this is what I was thinking the other day. Canon's L IS 300mm f/4 glass costs about the same as Pentax's DA* 300mm. Despite the fact that Canon's lens contains way more gizmos and R&D.
I'll bet Canon's top of the line stuff is barely profitable. Think Takumar selling lenses in the 60s below cost to under cut the other top competitor Zeiss.
The overhead has got to much lower for Pentax's simpler to build lenses (in emerging markets like Vietnam no less)-- the profit margins have to be higher.
I'm no expert on Cameras or Marketing, but to me this is the narrative that's playing out.
Just thinking out loud (in text)
.