I hear you. Reason for me selling off my K-1 and buying K-3III was because I wanted to see my self the difference with AF being updated to 'modern standards'. Other than that, improvements were quite small compared to previous gen cameras and I'm alright with that, because it would be unrealistic to expect anything more. By having the K-3III I'm quite optimistic that K-1III will do the same thing. really for example taking photos just for fun at home/birthdays is quite different when yuou have nice pictures of the persons who did come at there and you don't have to stop everything in order to get those memories and all properly focused. Let alone if some one would pay you a bit of money to do so at their own parties/events.
Huge cold sweat day before shoot did go away. (yes, all did go well in the end, but percentage was very low with keepers)
This is my thoughts and for many it might not be that big deal, but many would expect having atleast decent AF, and not to have to worry about that too.
Yes, you can use also MF skills and even more so use old manual lenses to make it even more enjoyable process. In fact I do do so too, and we re not alone. I have a feeling that this new K-1III might have even more smart way to do it that K-3III has now, just because it will be the new flagship... I'd also think that 5 yrs is good age for a camera, first 2 yrs you have still plenty new tricks to learn. there are still pretty good 10 yrs old cameras out there, they will lack most recent features, but can still be used and they do deliver great images...
Originally posted by reh321 I feel sympathy for K-1 owners - but only so much. I decided that the life of a digital camera was about five years - the same allowance I give to a computer. I realized last night that my KP will be five this coming Christmas season, with the only reasonable replacement {the KF} being even older in design. I had thought it was the last camera I would purchase …… before I understood it’s focusing issues. Now, I’m thinking of turning off the auto focus when photographing {moving} trains, and using the same technique I used 40 years ago, or even making more use of the 40-year-old {film} “Super Program”.
---------- Post added 03-09-23 at 18:57 ----------
Originally posted by Wheatfield I just dropped over $4k into upgrading my Fuji system with an X-T5, a lens, and some other accessories, and I have another lens on the horizon. If Pentax doesn't release a K1 replacement fairly soon, I might end up being so invested in Fuji that I won't be buying a K1III, and that would be sad. This is the risk Ricoh takes by not putting sufficient resources into getting new products out the door.
As an aside, the X-T5 recognizes trains as part of it's AF function.
Yeah, well it is Pentax after all...so a bit of delay is part of the process. I did get Canon R5C for video/photos and I also needed lens and I did buy RF dual FE 5.2/2.8(main reason why Canon 3D180VR, I believe it is still coming!(I do like VR video actually)). was looking at Canon RF70-200/2.8 and now I'm looking at /4 version(better with video actually and I have 24-105/4 and that is also nice for video, and cheap compared to 2.8 vers.), because my DFA * 70-200/2.8 is cheap compared to either of those. I also think that DFA * 50&80/1.4 are also bargains for what they are(IF there is updated AF, like K-3III) and will just go with those instead of investing higher end Canon lenses for the same purpose...
After all taking photos is great with Pentax as well as colours&files are very nice
I can wait, only becaue K-3III was the -game changer- for pentax.