Originally posted by NewRsoul I really don't understand all this pain towards the little K-m/2k? Most of the upgraders / entry level people at the moment jump on the Nikon D40/60 wagon as it's really cheap here in the UK, and as we know from experience if you start down one path (Nikon), you normally continue. So to get them into Pentax at a low level is a great idea. In fact if they sell enough of the little wonders, then they'll make the money to throw at the FF the FF brigade are baying blood for :->
I personally don't want a k-m, but I think it's a great little DSLR in black or trendy white, lets all promote it to our non DSLR freinds as a fantastic first step into real photography that won't cost them a fortune!!
Peter
It's good points. The thing about the D40s is, they're wonderful entry level cameras for the money, now, ... adding more lenses or VR to them starts adding up the money pretty quickly, though, and there's no real way to use the older lenses till you get into thousand dollar bodies. Probably people *will* tend to want to stay with Nikon, once in, (not a bad product if you can afford it, though I find that anything like an affordable lens just doesn't have the specs you'd want for the money. )
Pentax can probably get somewhere targeting a little more toward 'beginners' than the 'want a better point and shoot' category. Students, ...and folks like my little sister, who's kind of eighty-five percent snapshooter and the rest the creative played-with-photo-in- art-school-who-used-my-hand-me-down FTbs.
Pentax has always been good as a gateway to *photography* ...as a hobby, as getting started learning a trade, as being loved by artists. It's no longer hard to add automation to things: if they took a philosophy of not holding back or dumbing down or crippling the entry level cameras in the name of trying to compete with D40s, they can do well with certain segments.
Make sure things stay compatible and ready to grow with: give em two control dials, and the buttons, maybe, ...have a simpler control interface when you throw a switch from 'advanced' to 'simple' or however you'd phrase it, ...don't leave anything off just to sell a more expensive model: obviously some things'll jack up the price a lot, thus are best left for more advanced models, but it makes me think of the thing that first actually got Pentax my notice, on a different level.
K20d. The put a *PC cord socket on there.* That shows some *respect.* Teeny little thing that probably costs a dime. But it's something that's *not* some engineer somewhere telling me I don't need that if I'm not buying a behemoth that costs more than any car I ever owned.
Didn't think I'd be in the market for a fourteen MP DSLR so soon, or be fussing about ...well, much in terms beyond 'Can I email the local papers something printable and save me some film and be in a position to modernize' But a little thing like that got my attention.
To talk about niche markets, you know, a little less likely to happen with most digital shooters than how it was with film, but if a company made a nice affordable backup that was small enough to stay out of your way and not annoy you, that was gold: also, you could say to beginners, when they ask 'What camera should I buy?" "Here, one of these is good. Still use em for backup, myself." "What's the difference?" "It's... kind of like a better tennis racket. "
If as starting things, Pentax can be the brand for those intending to drive *stick,* from the get-go, (maybe without all that embarrassing stalling) ...that can be something.
Last edited by Ratmagiclady; 01-09-2009 at 01:18 PM.