Originally posted by nixcamic The 500D does 30fps 720p for half an hour. The K20D does 21fps for like 10 seconds. I think theres a difference there. If not for video, I'd take a K20D over anything not FF that canikon offers.
I thought the same. Esp. the 5DmkII video feature I found appealing.
But then I read an article by a Pro video maker about the 5DmkII. First of all, he said that its video mode is impertinent. If not for its unparalleled image quality with DoF and low light qualities, it would just have to be ignored. But it has these qualities, of course. What is lacking is everything else, almost. Focussing, exposure and zooming while shooting are impossible. Everything is preset. He had to work with a large external monitor connected to live view output to make any use out of it at all (for all manual control)
So, to some extent, the video mode offered by any DSLR right now is a gimmick, i.e., an engineer's after-thought.
Maybe, the K20D gets a 1/10 only. But then, a 5DmkII gets a 3/10 only as well. So, it doesn't really matter.