Originally posted by RBellavance I just hope we will be able to turn these auto-corrections off if we want to, especially if they are applied to RAW.
Indeed, however if they are well implemented I suspect that preference should be given to corrections as close to the original exposure as possible in the workflow to a finished image. Until now these corrections were part of the development of a RAW file, which was the result of a (slightly processed?) digitized readout from the sensor. If the in-camera corrections can be applied to the data before it is sampled to the RAW output bit rate, we can only win, esp if the actual properties of a given lens can be taken into account.
Note that this implies that for each (now unforeseen) new lens that Pentax will add to the line-up a new firmware upgrade will be required. Also sufficient free space should be foreseen in the in-camera lens table. Alternatively there will be a new generation of in-lens chips, which will include the necessary parameters, and the in-camera lens database will be used for "historic" Pentax lenses only, provided they are recognised. So it will be F, FA and DA generation only (incl. all subgenerations) in the lens table. *If* a lens table is provided and it's not just for new lenses only? Perhaps that's why the DA*60-250/4 took so long, to include this new chip?
But in the end we'll only know more when the camera's are in our hands, i.e. when we can do some empirical testing. But probably we'll still be guessing to a large degree as to what the camera actually does and when it happens in the process...
Wim