Originally posted by Ishpuini I know Sune, I replied the same day...
But I see there's another reply in there in the mean time... Thanks for pointing it out!!
Wim
Yup, had been waiting for you to pick it up
It is an awesome picture, which you should be very proud of. Thanks for the additional explanation. (I of cause had to leave another answer as well
)
Originally posted by Adrian Owerko For most people Clean ISO @ 6400 is all you will ever need, unless you are shooting a wedding in the dark.. The K7 specs if true would make the perfect wedding camera.. If the Dynamic range and sensitivity are improved on the K20D sensor.. If the + 6fsp... AF lamp, HD video are true. Small form factor.. The Gap between APS-C & FF are a lot smaller these days! Not just in size.. Were as there is a big size & performance difference between FF & Medium Format.. Back in the films days, 35mm was the amateur format., medium format is what the PRO photog used! When I do a wedding I don't want to carry a 5D / D700 brick..I know a lot of working Pro's complain about this they say the 5D & D700 are great cameras but are to big! Only if they could make it smaller! For field work! I like Pentax's thinking in regards to this.. APS-C is a good balance between size and performance.. With APS-C You can make a camera that is near the same size and weight as what a 35mm film camera is..
Good points. I would really prefer a high performance cam in a small package as well. Many times, even a D300, D700, or Eos 5D; would be too big and cumbersome.
And should I need larger, it is always possible to add grip to an upcoming K7, or also have a K10/K20/K30 size camera.
I love the form factor of the K-m, but it is just a little lacking. Think this K7 would be great.
Fun picture too, know the feeling