Originally posted by kunik I look at your comments here and they all seem to imply you know something about the current development and performance of Pentax gear and then I look at your list of gear (in your sig) and I wonder why you would have such strong opinions on gear you've never used?
So what?
I have owned *ist D, DS and K100 and used in the field for K10 and K20 for units from my friends.
Tried all other Pentax bodies ever made for times. Its easy to get one to test and try, isn't it?
And why I haven't buy any Pentax body after the K100? For only one reason: No any body after the K100 from Pentax is worth my money! They are not true upgrade frankly. And more importantly, none of them met my expectations and usage requirements.
Quote: Then I see you gloat about how many people visit your site and I am not inspired to join the herd. At least people like Ken Rockwell usually try the gear before writing a review on it - the last contribution of yours I saw here amounted to a 645D performance review for a sensor that has probably not even been selected yet. I can't imagine your review of the K7 has any more insight than your review of the 645D.
My site is NOT solely a review site. I do put my test photos and my reviews though. But my site is more or less a news site and I consolidate news and posts from time to time, including my own works, or NOT.
Quote: If you ever get your hands on any of this gear to conduct actual tests post a link to your blog and I'm sure lots of people would love to see your results
I do. But since you said more than once again you never visited my site, how come you could know there is none?? (and before you made your unsubstantiated comments before you have ever read my site!)