Enjoy Waiting! (k7 final pic)

ftpaddict · 05-04-2009, 08:35 AM

Originally posted by ions

not you, the camera in the picture

don't take everything so personally

I read it a second time and got what he meant. I seriously lolled when I made the connection.

It's already discussed, mutant.

Best insult ever.

Dom · 05-04-2009, 12:14 PM

I want to be a mutant.

Yes I know the images is a load of BS.

nanok · 05-04-2009, 01:53 PM

Originally posted by ftpaddict

I read it a second time and got what he meant. I seriously lolled when I made the connection.

It's already discussed, mutant.

Best insult ever.

indeed. i'll have to remember to use it in the future.

see you around. mutant..

Dom · 05-07-2009, 02:28 AM

Originally posted by ogl

Why you? I talk about Photoshoped body.

I'm not taking it personally it's just a grammatical error.

ngkmh · 05-07-2009, 03:10 AM

What lens is that?

Its definitely an SDM lens - is it the 16-50 or 17-70 or even a new lens?

fejker · 05-07-2009, 07:55 AM

It's been discussed before ... it's the DA* 55mm f/1.4 SDM and the picture is black and white.

PS: The camera is actually pink, it's just photoshoped so it looks black.

Cambo · 05-07-2009, 08:46 AM

Originally posted by fejker

PS: The camera is actually pink, it's just photoshoped so it looks black.

Don't give them any ideas...that white thing was bad enough.

Cheers,
Cameron

vitalsax · 05-09-2009, 07:58 PM

Now u have everything!

Mike Cash · 05-09-2009, 11:25 PM

Originally posted by Buddha Jones

I wonder who will be the first camera maker to include a built in bounce/diffuser for their built in flashes.

I wonder which will be the first to remove the damned things altogether from their top-of-the-line models.

fejker · 05-10-2009, 12:32 AM

Originally posted by Buddha Jones

I wonder who will be the first camera maker to include a built in bounce/diffuser for their built in flashes.

Originally posted by Mike Cash

I wonder which will be the first to remove the damned things altogether from their top-of-the-line models.

Actually Canon has done it with their 5D and 1D years ago, Olympus has done it years ago with their E-1 ... to bad it came back with the E-3, Nikon has done it with the D1, D2 and D3.

Lots of "firsts" here. I don't use flashes so to me it doesn't matter if there is one built into the camera or not. But I think it comes in handy when slave flash triggering is needed.

ftpaddict · 05-10-2009, 09:47 AM

Not sure what's bothering you all so much. Don't like it, don't use it.

ryan s · 05-10-2009, 10:16 AM

Originally posted by ftpaddict

Not sure what's bothering you all so much. Don't like it, don't use it.

Yup.

Better yet...make it decent for those times when we ("I") don't feel like getting the ol' hotshoe flash out

**Marc Langille** · 05-10-2009, 10:34 AM

Originally posted by Gio645

FA* 300 f2.8 maybe?

Yes - I can state with certainty...

Mousehill · 05-10-2009, 10:42 AM

Originally posted by Marc Langille

Yes - I can state with certainty...

If I look at my FA* 300/2.8 it would seem that these lenses have more scratches. The one on the photo looks spotless, must be another lens ........

**Marc Langille** · 05-10-2009, 10:53 AM

Originally posted by Mousehill

If I look at my FA* 300/2.8 it would seem that these lenses have more scratches. The one on the photo looks spotless, must be another lens ........

It's the healing tool in Photoshop...

How are you doing Mike!?? Everything is good on that side of the world?

Regards,
Marc

05-07-2009, 03:10 AM	#110
ngkmh Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Photos: Gallery Posts: 41	What lens? What lens is that? Its definitely an SDM lens - is it the 16-50 or 17-70 or even a new lens?

05-07-2009, 08:46 AM	#112
Cambo Veteran Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Vancouver, BC Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 1,016	Hey... Originally posted by fejker PS: The camera is actually pink, it's just photoshoped so it looks black. Don't give them any ideas...that white thing was bad enough. Cheers, Cameron

05-10-2009, 10:42 AM	#119
Mousehill Forum Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Netherlands Photos: Gallery Posts: 58	Not so sure.... Originally posted by Marc Langille Yes - I can state with certainty... If I look at my FA* 300/2.8 it would seem that these lenses have more scratches. The one on the photo looks spotless, must be another lens ........

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
POST A PIC TO OWN THE PIC ABOVE! (Game)	ll_coffee_lP	Mini-Challenges, Games, and Photo Stories	788	08-01-2015 01:01 AM
Misc Here's one you should all enjoy	enoeske	Post Your Photos!	2	01-11-2010 10:53 PM
You Might Enjoy This	benjikan	General Talk	0	07-23-2009 04:56 AM
K-7 New pic Final!	vitalsax	Pentax News and Rumors	37	05-18-2009 08:05 PM
Iso 1600 pic and a Butterfly Pic...	Eastern Shore Charlie	Post Your Photos!	5	07-06-2008 10:27 AM

05-04-2009, 08:35 AM	#106
ftpaddict Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Yurp Photos: Gallery Posts: 4,666	Originally posted by ions not you, the camera in the picture don't take everything so personally I read it a second time and got what he meant. I seriously lolled when I made the connection. It's already discussed, mutant. Best insult ever.

05-04-2009, 12:14 PM	#107
Dom Guest	I want to be a mutant. Yes I know the images is a load of BS.

05-04-2009, 01:53 PM	#108
nanok Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Photos: Gallery Posts: 969	Originally posted by ftpaddict I read it a second time and got what he meant. I seriously lolled when I made the connection. It's already discussed, mutant. Best insult ever. indeed. i'll have to remember to use it in the future. see you around. mutant..

05-07-2009, 02:28 AM	#109
Dom Guest	Originally posted by ogl Why you? I talk about Photoshoped body. I'm not taking it personally it's just a grammatical error.

05-07-2009, 07:55 AM	#111
fejker Inactive Account Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Slovenia Photos: Gallery Posts: 258	It's been discussed before ... it's the DA* 55mm f/1.4 SDM and the picture is black and white. PS: The camera is actually pink, it's just photoshoped so it looks black.

05-09-2009, 07:58 PM	#113
vitalsax Inactive Account Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: U.S. /Miami - Florida. Posts: 208 Original Poster	Now u have everything!

05-09-2009, 11:25 PM	#114
Mike Cash Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Japan Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,950	Originally posted by Buddha Jones I wonder who will be the first camera maker to include a built in bounce/diffuser for their built in flashes. I wonder which will be the first to remove the damned things altogether from their top-of-the-line models.

05-10-2009, 12:32 AM	#115
fejker Inactive Account Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Slovenia Photos: Gallery Posts: 258	Originally posted by Buddha Jones I wonder who will be the first camera maker to include a built in bounce/diffuser for their built in flashes. Originally posted by Mike Cash I wonder which will be the first to remove the damned things altogether from their top-of-the-line models. Actually Canon has done it with their 5D and 1D years ago, Olympus has done it years ago with their E-1 ... to bad it came back with the E-3, Nikon has done it with the D1, D2 and D3. Lots of "firsts" here. I don't use flashes so to me it doesn't matter if there is one built into the camera or not. But I think it comes in handy when slave flash triggering is needed.

05-10-2009, 09:47 AM	#116
ftpaddict Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Yurp Photos: Gallery Posts: 4,666	Not sure what's bothering you all so much. Don't like it, don't use it.

05-10-2009, 10:16 AM	#117
ryan s Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Madison, WI Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,383	Originally posted by ftpaddict Not sure what's bothering you all so much. Don't like it, don't use it. Yup. Better yet...make it decent for those times when we ("I") don't feel like getting the ol' hotshoe flash out

05-10-2009, 10:34 AM	#118
Marc Langille Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: NW Arkansas, USA Posts: 4,710	Originally posted by Gio645 FA* 300 f2.8 maybe? Yes - I can state with certainty...

05-10-2009, 10:53 AM	#120
Marc Langille Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: NW Arkansas, USA Posts: 4,710	Originally posted by Mousehill If I look at my FA* 300/2.8 it would seem that these lenses have more scratches. The one on the photo looks spotless, must be another lens ........ It's the healing tool in Photoshop... How are you doing Mike!?? Everything is good on that side of the world? Regards, Marc