Originally posted by mattdm Why's that?
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'd be surprised and disappointed if that's what Ned means by "I'm talking about the 'soul of a camera' and is this something that can be felt and appreciated by the photographer who uses that tool?"
Actually, you're right to ask the question. I read the OP's post too quickly and thought he was referring to the meter/prism as the link to / object of Ned's post.
I had intended to contemplate whether a camera can have a uniqueness that sets it apart from the commonplace, if competent, tool - and then add a second reply.
I imagine a camera can inspire a photographer to
believe it is special. I imagine there is something in some cameras that goes beyond just features and abilities - the camera just feels right - from the start - and the photographer intuitively understands it.
Many photographers have a relationship, unique to themselves, with one brand or model or another of camera, but few cameras universally inspire admiration and evoke this special feeling.
For me Pentax cameras have become familiar and comfortable, but that isn't quite deep enough, I imagine, to reflect Ned's question.
But in my hands a K2 has a soul. A KX is a wonderful tool; an MESuper is a delight; a clean F1 is a thrill to use.
But there is something about the experience of using a K2 - maybe the sound of the shutter, maybe CHOICE of match-needle or AE, maybe mine has split-image - I don't know - that is special and magical.
Will the K-7 really have the mystique of a Limited lens - do you remember the buzz about the 43 - or is Ned's blog part of the viral marketing campaign? I certainly hope it is the former.
Last edited by monochrome; 05-03-2009 at 06:06 AM.