Originally posted by Ash May be quite a revolution in incorporating good quality moving images with stills, though I'm sceptical that a 'hybrid' dSLR+movie cam could compare with a dedicated good quality movie cam.
This will be first-gen, and I'm sure the tech will improve with time (pretty quickly I'll guess), but movie cam tech is another world.
I mean have you seen how advanced and how expensive they can get?
Yes, it's true, that new cameras can compete with dedicated video cameras...because the brands donīt want that:
5d mark ii : excelent image quality, unbeliveable low light...but no manual controls.
They do it on purpose, to not castrate their own video camera market.
Just compare a frame of the 5d with canon XL H1...
Panasonic: GH1: It has everything to be a brutal video camera...but the compression is...very very very bad...
Pentax donīt have nothing to loose...if they put a good IQ like 5d mark ii, with every manual controls like GH1, they create a super motion and still camera, like RED is doing at a much higher price. And believe me...there's a lot of people out there that donīt mind to shoot independent movies with a camera meant for photography for a very low price.