Originally posted by Canada_Rockies Rob, I would appreciate seeing your settings. I also appreciate LR2 greatly, and DxO as well. I use PS E6 as my external editor for the odd time I need to do something out there. I am not a particular fan of darkroom work, whether digital or odorous.
OK, here is my custom DxO preset for the K10D:
-Exposure compensation--off
-DxO Lighting--on [Auto Mode--slight, Intensity--70 (default), Black and white points, brightness--default, Preserve shadow--off, Contrast global and local--default]
-Tone curve--off
-Raw white balance--As shot
-Vibrancy--off
-Color rendering--off
-Color modes--off
-Hue/Saturation/Lightness--off
-Multi-Point Color Balance--off
-Geometry--all off
-Sharpness--on [DxO lens softness--on (will only work for supported lenses), Unsharp mask--off]
-Dust--off
-Chromatic aberration--on [Purple fringing--on, Lateral chromatic aberration--on]
-Dxo Noise--on [Luminance and Chrominance--default]
I have found that this preset generally gives me good files to work on in Lightroom. Exposure is reasonable and color has not been altered by DxO, which tends to have garish colors for the K10D. When I process in DxO, I set the output for DNG, and I place the files in a folder that might be labeled xxxDNG. From that folder, I import the files into LR.
This combination of DxO and LR/ACR works so well that I am surprised that more people are not using it. I am sure that similar results could be obtained from DxO and Aperture and possibly other editing programs as well. Last night, out of boredom and just for fun, I processed a number files shot with the K10D and the FA 31 Ltd, which does
not have a correction module in DxO. I ran the files both through DxO/LR and LR alone. The differences were striking and entirely in the combo's favor. With supported lenses, the differences are even greater.
Hope this is helpful to you and anyone else who might be curious or interested.
Rob