Originally posted by nostatic
There certainly are others who aren't crazy about the ergos on the K7. We appear to be in the minority, but there are a few. The reality is there is no way you can please everyone.
Yes there is! Interchangeable grip options!
If the basic camera's too big, it's too big, but if it's too small in some dimension, it's possible to add more.
It'd be cool if Pentax took another cue from the LX and made facility to customize the grip, add a little to the bottom for those who don't like their pinkie being curled under the camera, for instance.
Quote: I think Pentax made exactly the right decision - they are filling a niche rather well and going smaller than the K20d makes perfect sense. And some are happily using any/all glass on it with great results. For me though, I only like the DA ltds on it, and since I have ended up shooting mostly with my FAs, the K20d stays.
It would be hard for them to beat the k20d in terms of fitting my hands, certainly. (If they could have made the grip just a hair less tall, that'd fit perfectly, too.) I was kind of hoping they'd use that shape for a real pro model, or at least the next upgrade. I've only seen pictures of the K-7 at this point, but it'd probably be OK. While smaller, it has a fatter grip, which is nice enough for my long fingers.
, and the battery grip looks like they made it just right. They did some other things that would seem to address my few quibbles: af button on the grip, the AE-L moved somewhere less out in left field, etc. (I'd use that a lot more if I could have it right near my thumb in position for a good secure hold, and set it to not be on all the time)
But, I'm pretty easy to make mostly-happy, it's that last five or ten percent...