The question in my mind is not one of whether there are differences in cameras, but if there are meaningful differences in cameras. These days, there such an emphasis on the technical differences in cameras that fairly small, trivial differences get magnified.
If a 200 kilogram man loses half a kilogram, that may be a big deal to him, but I certainly can be forgiven if I don't notice it right off. If you can drop your cholesterol level by 2 points, you may be really excited, but your doctor probably will tell you to keep working on it. There are real differences that are not meaningful differences.
The biggest differences in modern DSLRs (not comparing full frame to APS-C) have to do with ergonomics, ease of use, build quality. Sure you can take bad photos with any one of them, but its hard not to take good photos if you use them correctly.
All of which comes back to the point, that I would have a hard time reviewing a camera too hard for small technical differences if I felt like the over all camera package pushed me to use my camera more and get better photos in the process.
Last edited by Rondec; 08-16-2009 at 04:44 PM.