Originally posted by Xian What compatibility do you hope between K-mount and Ricoh EVIL system.
Neither 4/3 has completely compatibility with M4/3, they must us a adapter...
According to a user in Paris, he was directly told by a Ricoh rep that they would be K mount compatible, via a "trick in the body". Whether that means an in body optic or a folded optical path, or a lens mount capable of projecting to change the registration distance, who knows? Or it could be a load of BS. We'll find out in a couple of weeks.
Originally posted by ogl Silly post. High ISO performance of Samsung sensor is not bad. No NR in RAW in K-7 till ISO1600. If you add colour NR to K-7's PEF in convertor you'll get very good IQ. Not worse than K-x at ISO1600, but with better resolution and colours.
As silly as being in denial over the noticably poorer high ISO performance of the K7 when compared to the competition and the Sony sensor in the K-x? As silly as hyping a to this point vaporware camera system over a multi-manufacturer system that's already on the market and selling like hotcakes? As silly as not realizing that the EP1 has in body IS? Kindly supply some sample images from an NX and demonstrate how much better it is.
Didn't think so.
You're making a lot of definitive statements on could be's and should be's, but specs don't create images. Here in the land of reality, of what actually is, m43 is here and 90% of the way toward covering all the bases in the high level compact camera arena. Samsung missed the boat. If I'm wrong, in a few months you can say I told you so, but I seriously doubt it.