Originally posted by joele Thats sad, we don't really need another 100mm macro.. a 150mm like the Sigma 150 would be cool (even a 180 or 200) but not another 100...
Well there's a 200 but... 'kinda' expensive second hand
Seriously, yes a reedited 200 macro would be fine but I suspect Pentax thought in a FOV point of view: 35/2.8 replaces 50/2.8, 50->100 and 100->200mm. This isn't perfect at all IMO because 50,75,150 isn't quite the same as 50,100,200 (on FF)...
Still 200 macro on APS-C is about 300 on film. Not sure they'd sell many of'em if they only have APS-C cameras.