Originally posted by johnmflores I've enjoyed this discussion until recently. Kunzite, you are getting increasingly antagonistic and aggressive in your posts. I don't feel like I need to defend myself against these baseless claims. You don't know me.
Good day sir.
I'm getting
exasperated, seeing that many ridiculous "arguments" (and no, this is not a personal attack). Art Vandelay, insisting that their source of income should be at most prio#2, that the K-mount should be only "eventually" updated - that really was something. And circling around the same "arguments", not seeing even the slightly chance of reaching a common ground...
I am sorry if my tone upset you, this wasn't my intention. Probably I should take a walk away from this thread. Good day to you, too.
Art Vandelay II: don't underestimate the "trendy" thing, since IMHO that's what will push EVILs forward. People buying EVIL because they're "modern" and "new", while not looking at DSLR, as they are "old". Stuff like this.
You clearly said, the K-7 is perfectly adequate for our needs, so it should be only "eventually" updated. So I'm asking you: the others (canikon, mostly) haven't stopped replacing perfectly adequate cameras, why is that? Even the 7D, why did they make it? Wasn't the 50D adequate enough?
You're also ignoring that an EVIL will directly compete with the K-x. On the market, but also for internal resources.
juu, stop including the 645D as an excuse for not developing further the APS-C. Stop saying making DSLRs is a "strategy", unchanged from 2003. Please. It just doesn't make any sense.
And btw, you can't play that "game" very well, since we all know, the K-x beat the most successful m4/3 camera, in Japan. What I'm doing is being supportive to a successful strategy. Why you're doing is saying that a successful strategy should be immediately replaced