Originally posted by eddie1960 I too find the m module intriguing, but with the 28 module i could see it being my go to camera most days. lot's of speculation on various threads about possible K modules and others. Certainly your pics tell me it's more than good enough (think I'd want the OVF or EVF though I have a bugger of a time framing from a screen)
I see shortcomings and opportunities here.
CON: An LCD screen isn't EVF let alone OVF. Cams without VF's are chancy to use. A phonecam with a tiny sensor, short lens, and infinite DOF, that's one thing. Getting bird or beast or surveillance shots with a 600mm lens on a VF-less MILC? Totally something else, and not appealing. Will the modules support CIF and SR?
PRO: The Q and M modules are both short register, with Q <10mm and M <28mm. With adapters, Q could take cine lenses, and M could take ALL 135/FF and APS-C SLR and RF lenses. The K module need only be an M module with an adapter. So with just those two modules, the GXR becomes a universal receptor of lenses.
WOW: Just as a film camera exploits different qualities (resolution, spectrum, etc) by changing film, a GXR can support various modules: MF? 3D / Holo? UV / IR / Xray / forensic? Video? Foveon? Ultrasonics? It could be a sensor test-bed. Hack the connector and protocol, and custom sensor modules will appear, I'll betcha.
What I'd like to see: A GXR2 with EVF and open protocols.