Originally posted by BigMackCam Any fixed lens camera is at risk from dust on the sensor or sensor cover... Even the
really expensive ones
Unlike previous models, the GRIII benefits from in-camera sensor cleaning "using ultrasonic vibrations" (like the K-3), so even if dust gets on the sensor, most of the time it should be removed using this. But it's still possible you might one day get a spec or two that won't budge, and need to send the camera in for service. Such is the risk with all fixed lens cameras...
Thanks for your thoughts on the issue, much appreciated.
I jumped ahead a bit too quickly, didn't realize the GR111 is just out. A PF member in this post mentioned the fact that the GR3 intro is very recent.
I have since thought about the GR2, which according to all reviews is an excellent camera and one that has few, if any rivals...is size and performance. Also given that there seems to be some new old stock GR 2's still around and they are significantly cheaper than a GR3..has led me to considering the GR2.
The big issue for me with the GR2, is that a number seem to get dust on the sensor, due from what I've read the retracting action of the lens and where the camera is kept , carried, etc.
I have read in some reports that avoiding storing the body in dusty pockets can make a difference and others ensure the camera is is a light bag when not in use or that when it is in use , attaching the GH 3hood along with a 49mm filter that fits inot the hood seems to be somewhat effective.
I really like the concept of regularly carrying a small, well built, lightweight, unobtrusive camera with a fine wide angle lens and quite a large sensor..and for those reasons the Ricoh GR series appeals to me.
In the past day or so, I've read quite a few reviews, some long term, of the GR digital and although the dust on the sensor has been acknowledged as an issue, with a number of people, it is difficult for me to get a 'sense' of whether this is a wide spread problem or rather unusual.
I do have another compact camera with a fixed, retractable lens, a Canon G12 and have had this unit since 2011. I've used it quite a bit and have yet to experience (touch wood
) any dust on the sensor. I don't know if this is because of pure luck, or my care of the camera, which is pretty good (keep it wrapped in a cotton handkerchief, inside a padded camera case, when not in use)..or due to the design of this small Canon camera.
I maybe focusing on this issue too much and perhaps it is not an issue. I don't know.
---------- Post added 03-17-19 at 05:37 PM ----------
Originally posted by aaacb I saw that many of the previous gr users talk about how they put the camera with no cover in a pocket, which invariably has lots and lots of dust, so it's also a matter of how you use it. Because of this risk and because it's a tiny camera for clumsy user, I got a four year insurance for everything incl drops and spills.
Compared to light leaks, dust, scratches, fingerprints, uneven development, drying marks, or even scanning bands (scanners get dust on their sensors too...), dust on digital sensors doesn't scare me as much, though I'll use my insurance if I ever need to have the sensor cleaned.
I've been reading that putting the camera in dusty pockets may well be the issue. As a GR owner, have you had any dust on the sensor and how long, if I may ask, have you had the GR ?
How do you carry it when out and about with the GR and how do you store the camera when it is not in use ? Are you happy with the performance of your GR ? from everything I've read this quite an exceptional picture taker.
Thanks, Les
---------- Post added 03-17-19 at 05:39 PM ----------
Originally posted by victormeldrew It was released yesterday. It's a little early to tell how well the DR will work.
Yes, I agree. I jumped the gun a bit regarding my questions about the GR3.