Well to tell the truth iam not so optimistic about the pentax FF. I fear that pentax will deliver a half finished product, a 24MP thing which wont outclass the D800 in ANY area and it will be adsurdly high priced at the beginning
Again we will try to make the best of it and will start talking about the second SD-Slot(which is missing) which nobody uses, the AF which is "fast enough" for everything and AF-Problems which just appear on very rare occasitions.
I just hope that Pentax starts to develop complet new lenses. High quality, FAST AF, well build etc.
I think Pentax has almost everything covered (in regards to the focal length) but i think IF you want to place such a product you need fast and very high quality lenses in a complet line up. I dont think that people are attracted by the idea of buying from third partys.
I dont mean that third party lenses are bad( owning a Sigma 70-200 myself), but i think it isnt a plus to say to a customer " well for this focal length pentax doesnt offer anything real good, but here you can have a sigma"
So iam much more interested in the way pentax is going with its lenses.
Also i would like to see a clear nomenclature about the lenses. For example
DA L(ight) = cheap, plastic etc.
DA = normal, WR
DA* = high quality WR + SDM(or faster)
DF(ull)A = normal FF, WR
DF(ull)A* = high quality WR, SDM(or faster)
And make sure that every (new) DA is actually WR
SDMs(or faster) will JUST be applied in DA* or DFA*
Nothing like the DA17-70 SDM......
Me, for myself dont see a greater scheme pentax is applying and i thing that is bad overall.
Yes, i know that Pentax had two new owners in the last 4 years, but if ricoh want to start with something, this would be a good thing too.