Originally posted by Clavius When you choose a nickname that is offensive to the very forum you're registering to, you kinda paint a big fat bullseye on your head.
That's your personal interpretation. I've already given you how that nickname came about. You chose not to believe me, but what can I do about that.
You do know Lamy, the PEN maker, don't you? It's a word play. Maybe not obvious to you, but who made you the judge over my intentions?
Quote: The topic here is the Pentax FF rumors, not the Pentax lens lineup. There are multiple, extensive threads on that.
Taken out of context. I've given explanation why I think releasing the body is not wise due to the lack of proper lenses in production. You disagree with that. That doesn't make me derail the thread.
Quote: One you already know and ignored
Again, what's the point there? One zoom that sort of works does not make a proper lineup. Also, why "ignored"?
Quote: -An ocean of used glass. The zooms you crave can be found amongst the FA's.
Which might turn out to be not that great due to old coating. Also, *you* think I crave zooms, I've never expressed that. I stated that it's wise to release new ones.
Again, you're overanalyzing what I say.
Quote: I agree, it would be smarter of Pentax to cover the holes in their lineup theirselves and with new lenses asap
So when you agree on that, why the drastic reaction? Ricoh has clearly stated their business perspective with Pentax.
Quote: But the question there is: Can they afford to wait even longer with issueing a FF camera while their competition is vastly expanding their FF capabilities for lower and lower prices?
They maybe can wait one or two more years. APS-C is nearing its practical resolution maximum.
Consider this: Pentax Ricoh wants more market share. That doesn't work so well by merely satisfying their current user base. It's all about those guys who buy a new DSLR, ask for full frame... and the seller says: "Then you should consider Pentax".