Originally posted by zxaar Why they are two different things, market share is what market share is, one and the same thing. All the things you want to conclude about FF from its market share you shall be concluding the same for pentax itself too.
Because they are different things?
1. The FF:APS-C DSLR markets ratio, which proves beyond doubt that APS-C are mainstream and FF aren't.
2. Pentax competing on the mainstream market but having a low market share.
I'm not sure what you want me to conclude about Pentax, or what you're trying to prevent me from concluding about FF. Please state it clearly.
Originally posted by zxaar thank you. I wanted to hear this. The fact is that you have no way of knowing what is going to happen. So this statement that you made earlier is useless and has no bearing on future.
My statement is talking about the present, it's ridiculous to claim its invalidity because it "has no bearing on the future". Please re-think if you really have reasons to "combat" my affirmations.
There are actually methods which can be used to estimate into the future, based on past data. It's not the same as precognition, but it's much better than just making up stuff
But, again, we weren't talking about future.