Originally posted by Ash His thought was that there may be around 10 different prototypes being tested but he didn't know any details about them, only the one he claimed he had in his hands.
And he could still be telling the truth (about his experience at least), and as such making waves with a real product.
Come on,
Ash, I am not asking for the death of the poor sinner but...
Was the guy telling the truth when he wrote
Quote: I've known Ricoh representatives all my life. That's the only reason why they allowed me to test-run these cameras...
then
Quote: I grew up knowing Ricoh representatives and that's why they allow me to test out their cameras: Its a luck-based privilege.
or rather when he wrote
Quote: I know Pentax reps, have all my life.
Was the guy telling the truth when he wrote
Quote: FF... Same sensor as D600/A99/RX1
then
Quote: I mentioned it was the same sensor as the D600/A99/RX1 all use
knowing that D600 has a standard 6,016 x 4,016 pixels sensor, Alpha 99 a 6,000 x 4,000 pixels sensor with 102 phase-detection assist points and RX1 a standard 6,000 x 4,000 pixels sensor?
Was he telling the truth when he wrote
Quote: I heard rumors from Ricoh that they are working on a completely different module for the GXR: A full-frame KS mount module... Its to be what M4/3 is to the original 4/3 system... same mount, just a compressed flange distance.
Was he telling the truth "
(about his experience at least)" when he wrote
Quote: Almost all DA and all DA* lenses are full-frame compatible.
then
Quote: I shoot film SLRs with my DA lenses... no problems other than lots of vignetting which clears up by 2 stops. The newest lenses all work well, including my 16-50mm f/2.8 which is seriously wise at 16mm
then
Quote: It works with the DA* lenses and my film SLR accepts the DA lenses without major problems. I can't vouch for all the lenses and I didn't say it will accept all of them... But most DA lenses cover a full 35mm film area. I know this because I use them a lot. I know that the fisheye don't work though... sadly.
The 14mm prime does! (emphasis added)
or when he wrote about DA* 16-50 mm f/2,8 on his alleged 24x36 prototype
Quote: I do have one somewhere, but its not at 16mm ... It was vignetting too much and I didn't want to stop down, so I zoomed down to about the 20mm mark where the vignetting wasn't a problem...
Was he telling the truth when he wrote
Quote: Pentax (Hoya) makes glass for Leica. They use the same procedures and the same machines to make their lenses. In fact, the 77mm limited and the Leica 75mm have the same design (Minus the slight shift in the rear floating element group to compensate for the flange distance).
How would you qualify this logorrhea? Insider information, report on someone's own experience? or pure BS?