Originally posted by Class A That depends on what you mean by "practical terms".
I don't see an "obsession with equivalence". I see equivalence being used as a tool to compare lenses between different formats.
Equivalence is of course not a doctrine that prescribes that you must take a photo in one format exactly in the same way that you would have taken it on a different format.
You are obviously free to stop down to even f/8 on your 35mm lens in your example. Why would you not, if you want to?
The one thing you cannot claim, however, is that with a 35/1.8 lens on APS-C you can achieve the same as with a 50/1.8 ].
As one who shoots medium and large format film cameras I have never seen any mention of f stop equivalents when comparing format equivalents. There are numberous charts comparing field of view and not all are the same due to aspect ratio differences. Those charts will give you the equvalent focal lenghts using 35mm as the standard for 645,66,67,69,4X5,5X7 and 8X10 but have never seen any f stops associated with them.
Of course most if not all of these charts were created prior to the "need" for razor thin dof. Or of the apparent need to show one format has better than another
My 210 on the 5X7 is about the same as my 150 on the 4X5 for example and although they are like almost all LF lenses 5.6.
It seems like it is a very recent phenoneum to use f stop comparisions between formats. My 150 5.6 with a short extension tube on the Hasselblad is as narrow a DOF I would want on a portrait anyways. I personally like both the eyes and the nose to be in focus