Originally posted by aurele Not likely : it exists since the Eos 5 in 1992
But yes ! it would be welcome in the Pentax land !
Canon ditched it because it was a practical disaster. Why would a Pentax camera adopt such a quibble of a "tech"?
---------- Post added 06-16-2014 at 07:25 AM ----------
Originally posted by mee I disagree and hope asahiman continues to post as he has. It appears he is in the know more than most of us and provides what he learns. If one is taking what anyone says in this forum without a bit of caution, they shouldn't be reading the threads in this forum.
When you have a company with dysfunctional marketing, Asahiman's and similar assertions which prove not to be true only make Pentax brand ridiculous and a brand of disappointments. Like Ed stated in his video. Pentax carries that stigma of a failed to invigorate brand for a long, long time -- it had it in the age of film -- and fresh FF rumors like these only add to the disappointment about the brand.
If you Google Full Frame and Pentax right now, you'll get a handful of very juicy results, like PF's April 1st prank, many predictions and speculations. When a reader gets into reading Asahiman's predictions and sees the guy is loved by equally infatuated and deluded forums members, he puts more weight into those words that turn out to be a big disappointment.
Mind you, Asahiman was claiming in 2012 that Pentax has finally merged, that they got new people, teams work together, that they do this and that. He also claimed FF prototypes by using then K-5 as a shell. And then 2 years later we have the same story from him (now they are using the K-3) that they are still doing the same.
I have nothing against the man, but the results make the poor brand even more ridiculous.