Originally posted by normhead It's a different implementation, but you probably knew that.
No wind is a problem?
Really...
I have many , many images taken in no wind situations outdoors.... every one of which could have benefitted from the superior resolution and better low noise shadows provided by the K-3ii.
I'm always amazed at people who tell other people what their problems are, or how useful something might be to them.
I don't know if it's you have no experience with landscapes or just don't spend a lot of time out doors. Something's going on.
I'm in a coastal region, and there is almost always wind. If there is no wind it should work, yes.
The problem I see is that while a bit of movement normally leads to blur, in this system it may lead to artefacts. Just one pixel movement is enough.
But yes, I'm not much into landscapes. More into interiors, and even there there are situations where wind would make pixel shift impossible.
It's just a bit... overhyped IMHO.