Whatsapp is essentially free, no matter how much you use it, and much more flexible. Same with Viber (which adds voice functionality). So as long as you have a data flatrate you are covered.
Originally posted by jogiba The current mirrorless cameras do that already.
Ah yes, more or less they can. But AF doesn't work for example. Full, 100% support would be good. And I want it to be a Pentax, because Pentax gets photography. They can make tools that aid my photography, that make sense. Other brands seem to make less sense to me, are designed by people who aren't into photography (which is how I see Pentax in terms of video. They don't do it, they don't get it, for them it is a list of items it needs to have written on the box in order to sell and in order to get a decent review (which are done by people who don't get videography either and go through a checklist)). I want a Pentax because I like how it can handle life. How I don't have to worry in the rain. I like how they feel in my hands. A Sony can't do that, despite being decent. In any case I am not in a hurry to upgrade. My K-5 serves me well. And I've used my *istDS from 2008 till 2012... had I bought it directly in 2004 it would have been used for 8 years.
That is btw. a problem for Pentax IMHO. As a photography tool the *istDS pretty much satisfied me. The K-5 is more than good enough for any photographic needs in the next 10 years I reckon, I only wish the AF was more accurate, even in broad daylight it can be all over the place at f1.8. All the areas where I see possible big improvements are outside of photography. I guess that is why I keep asking for video improvements, despite me mostly taking photos. And I think I'm not the only one who is perfectly fine with an older DSLR, they have been more than good enough for a long time now.
Btw. if I wanted a photography only tool, I'd get a Fuji. They are even better than Pentax, but completely suck at video. It's hard for Pentax to compete on the how it makes you feel side.