I have been reading a LOT about full-frame..... pros and cons. Well, here is my take on it.
I started photo taking with my Minolta SRT-101 in 1968. 50mm 1.4 was the popular lens back then.
When that was stolen, I went to Konika ( similar to Minolta) then later to Minolta x700..
It took me 40 years before going into DSLR.... my first choice was Pentax K10D.
I had to make a lot of adjustemnts : 50mm is just not good any more for indoors/family/party stuff like it was with film.
Anything with APSC has to go at the very least 35mm......
Even outside, taking landscapes, my old 50mm with Minolta was, let's say __adequate__.
I have been with APSC 6 years now and I still have trouble adjusting to the "zoom by moving your feet" method.Seems to me I did not have to do that much with my film camera ( I do NOT like zooms: prefer standard)
In the old days, even 35mm lenses started showing aberrations in the corners.... although it is not much apparent on APSC, my stupid mind still sees them in my head.
And now with FF becoming a "little-bit" more affordable, I will sure get one and go back to my comfort zone.
I guess that by now you have figured out I am a grouchy-over-60 guy..... But I am sure others are out there.
Does anyone else have trouble adjusting to the crop factor vs the good old film days ?
Well... that was my 2 cents