[dtmateojr]

I've explained it to you several times.

Where? Am I going blind? Why don't you explain it here so that everyone can see what a genius you really are Grab a line or two in my article and post your counter-argument. It's that simple. I'll grab some popcorn while you make fun of yourself.

[ElJamoquio]

Where? Am I going blind? Why don't you explain it here so that everyone can see what a genius you really are Grab a line or two in my article and post your counter-argument. It's that simple. I'll grab some popcorn while you make fun of yourself.

I'm not going to waste my time reminding you of all the times I tried, gently and politely, to educate you on the matter. Do your own search. You'll have plenty of time after you get banned again.

[normhead]

Am I missing something? I've been busy, someone get me up to speed ...

[dtmateojr]

I'm not going to waste my time reminding you of all the times I tried, gently and politely, to educate you on the matter. Do your own search. You'll have plenty of time after you get banned again.

So bottomline is you can't. So please keep quiet.

[ElJamoquio]

Last I checked you didn't own this forum, this wasn't your thread. The powers that be tolerate juveniles such as yourself but blatant namecalling and such is not allowed. I give you another 12 hours before you're banned.

[ElJamoquio]

You started the namecalling. You started referencing dpreview which is a totally unrelated forum. All you ever do is full frame this full frame that, gear here and more gear there but you do not even understand what you are peddling. You do not have any arguments to your claims. And now you are calling the mods to ban me. So childish.

Truly, an empty can rattles the most.

Demonstrably wrong on all counts.

[dtmateojr]

Demonstrably wrong on all counts.

So back on topic. What's wrong with my article? Copy and paste the line here and explain EXACTLY why it is wrong.

.

---

Last edited by Ash; 10-07-2014 at 04:22 AM.

[jsherman999]

So back on topic. What's wrong with my article? Copy and paste the line here and explain EXACTLY why it is wrong.

If you can't follow very simple instructions or if you have nothing else better to do other than mocking me then could you please STFU.

I've commented on your site itself - didn't do much good, you discounted what I had to say. I've talked to you here several times - absolutely no effect, physical reality seemed to take a holiday. I did ask the mod team over there why you were banned and they said it's because you were behaving like a 12-year old... which you've been doing here as well.

Here, I'll let bobn2 answer your "what's wrong with my article" question, I've already tried to no avail (bobn2 = physicist, owner/creator of sensorsgen site.)

[dtmateojr]

I've commented on your site itself - didn't do much good, you discounted what I had to say. I've talked to you here several times - absolutely no effect, physical reality seemed to take a holiday. I did ask the mod team over there why you were banned and they said it's because you were behaving like a 12-year old... which you've been doing here as well.

Here, I'll let bobn2 answer your "what's wrong with my article" question, I've already tried to no avail (bobn2 = physicist, owner/creator of sensorsgen site.)

ROFL!

Serious question, did you understand the arguments in that thread or did you just assume that because they were responding to me that they must be correct and I must be wrong because they have some kind of background credentials? :-D

What did you understand in that thread? What is it in that thread that negates the points I have raised in my Debunking Equivalence article? Can you point them out in here?

Or are you just as clueless as the other fauxtogs?

BTW, bobn2 does not even understand sampling theory or f-stop or basic knowledge of calculus. So much for his "physics" background LOL!

[clackers]

So much for his "physics" background LOL!

Did you really say the focal length was an example of the inverse square law in action?

I was a physics teacher in A Previous Life and am appalled.

And you parade ignorance in a blog? What's wrong with you?

A fellow Aussie, too. I think you're jeopardizing our UN membership.

[dtmateojr]

Did you really say the focal length was an example of the inverse square law in action?

I was a physics teacher in A Previous Life and am appalled.

And you parade ignorance in a blog? What's wrong with you?

A fellow Aussie, too. I think you're jeopardizing our UN membership.

So explain to me how f-stop works. Please educate me

[clackers]

It is a ratio calculated only on the lens, *not* the sensor, whether the FF in your blog post or the m4/3.

Something very wrong with you.

[dtmateojr]

It is a ratio calculated only on the lens, *not* the sensor, whether FF or m4/3.

Something very wrong with you.

ROFL! That's it? So your explanation of how f-stop works is by giving me a definition? Something is very wrong with you. No wonder why you stopped teaching.

[clackers]

ROFL! That's it? So your explanation of how f-stop works is by giving me a definition?

Zero marks for you, I'm afraid, Mr Inverse Square.

I gave a contradiction of your weird beliefs, not a definition.

Best if you remain in my office lest the other kids in the yard beat you up again!

[dtmateojr]

Zero marks for you, I'm afraid, Mr Inverse Square.

I gave a contradiction of your weird beliefs, not a definition.

Best if you remain in my office lest the other kids in the yard beat you up again!

So where did I say that f-stop is dependent on sensor size? In fact, I have stated exactly that f/2 is f/2 regardless of format.



---------- Post added 10-07-14 at 19:01 ----------

It's really funny 'coz a lot of fauxtogs here say that I'm wrong and yet they can't even provide any counter-arguments.