Yesterday, some guy asked me if i want to drive his McLaren F1 on his very own race track.(He misses competition...) I even would get a massage by some supermodel afterwards.
I rejected and said, that i am fully satisfied with the 40mp/h top speed AIXAM I own, i always compete with the son of my neighbour(he drives a 12" deep red tricycle...) My dog will kiss me good night then.
---------- Post added 09-26-14 at 11:49 AM ----------
Originally posted by jsherman999 Actually I shoot a Sigma 50-150 2.8 HSM II on my D800 in 1.5x crop mode - It's so good I can't bring myself to sell it and buy a 'proper' 70-200. So, save that 50-150 for FF! Bet something else!
---------- Post added 09-23-14 at 08:41 AM ----------
I notice these rumours often include some sales rep or source smiling/grinning mysteriously. Problem is they've been holding that grin for 5 years running.
To be serious. I really do not see any problem, because until now, one never saw such an awesome FF DSLR lens at photokina.
But now something serious.
Sometimes when i think about some pentaxians on this forum, i think i would rather like to switch to Nikon or Canon, then dealing with people who are thinking that absurd and irrational.
Don't get me wrong, i think, the APS-C DSLRs from Pentax are doing great, but a FF will do much better. So i really do not like to deal with people who pursue self-deceit as there main hobby. Take the "What could be different about PENTAX FF?" discussion. It seems like 1 up to 2 3rds of the people who contribute to this thread, are just trolling and writing counterproductive posts.
No it could be available in green, it could have this or that...none, nuff! Sarcasm, bla, bla, sarcasm.. OK, at last, some people had the idea of interchangeable sensor units... But that would feel to experimental to me.
I would like to ask those people, who love to talk PENTAX FF to death:
When you are going to buy yourself a new car,
Would you reject an eDacia for 14.000Dollars that offers technology from a BMW i3 or an electrified Mercedes B Class(which both cost more than 45.000Dollars) in favour of a Car that costs 12.000 Dollars and has a range of only 80 miles?
To be honest, i can't await the nitpicky comments on how lame this comparison is.
Last edited by patarok; 09-26-2014 at 11:51 AM.