Originally posted by ElJamoquio I'm fine with the 'new'. I was never speaking of anything EXCEPT 'new'. Prices in the used market might be relevant to some but less so in the public-at-large outside of specialty forums like this one.
If you think people aren't going to cross-shop the A7 against the A7II or whatever the new Pentax is, I think you're under-estimating the ability of the public to optimize the value of their dollar.
And, no, I disagree completely with your assessment that MSRP's is more relevant than street price. On the contrary, I believe that the MSRP is a fantasy price that doesn't matter to anyone.
Today, you can purchase a brand-new full frame camera for $1298. Wow. That's $200 less than $1500. So when is the first brand new sub-$1k FF camera going to be sold? I heard that FF cameras wouldn't be sold for less than $2k.
The camera will be launched on a market crowded with lots of products, brand new, older but still sold as new and second hand - there will be cross shopping between all of them I guess. Competing on price will be impossible, there will always be a cheaper camera.
The MSRP is the initial street price for which products are sold, so your assertion is funny. And how could I talk late street prices for a camera we hope it might be announced next year? No, it's too early even for MSRP talks. Except to recognize it won't be the cheapest
Besides, there's a big disadvantage of only looking for "the cheapest price": it will get you the cheapest camera
Good luck waiting for the Sony's first under $1000 twice replaced camera (A7 in another year, I'd guess); I'm waiting -
and willing to pay - for a proper Pentax DSLR