[redrockcoulee]

Only my DA 15 would not be FF. I will be selling my FE 17-28 which is FF simply as do not use it much and now with the FA 20-35 even less need for it.

Even though all my lenses but one will work I see no reason for me to buy one.

My wife's two main lenses would not work and she has no desire to upgrade.

[shaolen]

Man!! I'm really pissed I didn't buy that FAJ 19-35mm now! Full frame is here!

[derekkite]

Is the DA 12-24 full frame? I have an F100 2.8, a A50 1.4, and the long stuff would work just fine.

[zzeitg]

Not sure if the FF-preparation was my main motivation, but I've just ordered FA* 28-70.

[VoiceOfReason]

Here's what I have. AFAIK only 4 of these aren't FF compatible.

Pentax DA18-135WR
Pentax DA 40xs f/2.8
Pentax F 50 f/1.7
Takumar F 70-210 f/4-5.6
Pentax F 28-80 f/3.5-4.5
Pentax 1.7 AF adapter
Sigma 150-500 f/5-6.3 HSM
Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 HSM Art
Sigma 24-70 HSM f/2.8
Sigma 70-300 DL Macro
Sigma 8-16 f/4.5-5.6
Tamron 17-50 f/2.8
Tamron 70-200 f/2.8

[kooks]

I have:

Pentax DA 10 -17mm (i might sell this one)
Pentax M 50mm f1.7
Pentax M 50mm f2.0
Vivitar 28mm f2.8 macro
Sigma 30mm f1.4 ART (This is an APS-C glass but according to Canon/Nikon users it can also work with FF without that much vignetting)
Tamron 17 - 50mm f2.8 ( i will sell this to get the 24 - 70mm )
Tamron 70 - 200mm f2.8 ( i will keep this one until i save enough to get the new Pentax 70-200 )

I want..
a new 50mm f1.4, and 85mm f1.4 or Pentax 77mm f1.7, and perhaps a wide angle.. like something between 15mm and 20mm

[saladin]

I have:

K55 1.8
K24 2.8
Bower 14mm 2.8
Sigma 24-60 2.8
Sigma 70-200 2.8
Sigma 150-500

All FF and ready to go. There are other lenses i want and hope to add - FA 77, Siggie 85, 35 macro, 30 art, etc etc - but ive consciously put my lenses together with FF in mind.

Edit: all that said, upgrading my k5 to the k3 might still take preference over the upcoming FF. Heck, i still want a GR too. We'll see, i guess.

---

Last edited by saladin; 02-06-2015 at 04:21 AM.

[awaldram]

I have the 1.4 HD Wr converter ...... ergo all my lens are FF compatible without cropping

[shaolen]

I have the 1.4 HD Wr converter ...... ergo all my lens are FF compatible without cropping

Does that reduce the light captured or change the depth of field at all?

[infoomatic]

i still scratch my head about a wideangle (20/21 mm) ... the a20/2.8 would be quite good I guess however, I have not seen any used ones within the last months. there is definitely a hole to fill for pentax: 20mm f/5.6 limited WR. razor sharp, flare resistant and small.
The zeiss 21mm would be nice but its big ... and no zk version on ebay the last months

[hoopsontoast]

I am now fully 'primed' (+ F70-210 and FA50 f1.7/M*300mm f4 if they dont sell)

[Jyrkira]

During 2014 I sold my DA 17-70, DA 70 Ltd, DA 15 Ltd and FA 35/2. Then I bought all the FA limiteds, FA J 18-35 and FA 20-35. This was my preparation for FF Pentax because I had quite strong feeling after CP+ 2014 interview with Pentax that the FF Pentax is coming.

So my camera bag is prepared for FF but my bank account is not.

[elpolodiablo]

I am covered from 24-500....but I want to get something wider. Maybe a Samyang 14 2.8?

Sigma AF 24 f2.8 II
Pentax F 28mm f2.8
Pentax FA 31mm f1.8 Limited
Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited
Pentax FA 77mm F1.8 Limited

Pentax DA40 f2.8XS
Pentax F 50 f1.7
Pentax FA 50 f1.4
Pentax FA 135mm f2.8

Tamron 28-75 f2.8
Tamron SP 70-200 f2.8
Sigma 170-500 APO

[shaolen]

During 2014 I sold my DA 17-70, DA 70 Ltd, DA 15 Ltd and FA 35/2. Then I bought all the FA limiteds, FA J 18-35 and FA 20-35. This was my preparation for FF Pentax because I had quite strong feeling after CP+ 2014 interview with Pentax that the FF Pentax is coming.

So my camera bag is prepared for FF but my bank account is not.

So jealous of the 18-35!

[shaolen]

so I just opened up a tamrac bag I had laying around and realized I have a takumar 135mm 2.5! So I'm good for longer telephoto