Originally posted by Wolfeye Interesting times we live in.
I don't recall what the rationale was for the world's first crop-sensor camera. IIRC it was due to the high cost of sensors. If photographers had rejected that first approach we might never have gotten into this whole FF vs crop debate, but everyone was eager to ditch their lowly (and "full frame") film cameras for the IG of digital. So you see, there was something more important than FF way back then, and the same is true now. Now price is king. Or limited access.
If you needed FF and Pentax you simply stayed shooting film. I've heard that it still makes remarkable images - 'cept you can't shoot 15000 frames and delete 14999 of them to get the shot you wanted. Well, not without going broke.
i love film! kinda tired of 135 though after experiencing the all-around friendliness of 120. also, there's a lot of jobs (i.e. school portraits and other such subcontract work) where digital is a requirement and o god is there ever a dearth of affordable wide glass that is decent in any way. full frame is just cheaper, overall, than crop.