Originally posted by DavidSKAF3 So, in a nutshell, or in as an exact manner as possible, what are the true pros (and cons?) of using a DSLR with a Full Frame sensor?
Some
PROS:
For similar sensor gen, you can realize less noise for the same FOV and exposure, and better DR as you shoot in situations hat move you up from base ISO.
You'll probably see anywhere from .75 to 1.5 stops better performance there ^.
You'll also have a bigger viewfinder, and probably see more accurate AF, although that's so dependent on the manufacturer's AF implementation that it's hard to attribute to "FF".
You will generally have more ability to control DOF outside of stopped-down landscape shooting.
Your lenses will show different FOV. 1.5x wider. This is a pro to some, a con to others.
Some
CONS:
Larger body, sometimes larger lenses, probably more expensive (although it doesn't need to be depending on lenses.)
Quote: And, can too many pixels be packed even into a Full Frame sensor, marring its performance?
.
Yes
Don't worry though, we're not there yet with Sony Exmor 36MP - that's one of the best sensors you can get in terms of SNR and DR. We'll have to see how that 54MP sensor stacks up when it arrives.
.