First of all, if you bought your APS-c lenses to work on APS-c cameras, then they still work for what you bought them for. If you bought your M, A, F, FA lenses to work on film cameras, they still work as intended. The "un-crippled" mounts they were made for are still uncrippled. And you can still use them.
Quote: My understanding from the beta unit's they have sent me to test is in quite a quandary. The DA's will be fully functional but will crop the FF image captured. The aperture with all M, A, F and Fa series will be crippled . what is the end result. Although all K-mounts that are FF will perfectly capture with the Beta's. my hopes are Ricoh/ pentax will not completely mess Up.
I think I get it.... you're talking about the "crippled mount" thing. That thing that a few people care about, and most of us don't notice. IN fact, I've forgotten what "crippled mount" means again, perhaps you can explain it. The fact is, it's like a tail. Humans are crippled in that they no longer have a tail. Those of us who sit on toilets find that quite convenient. Those of us who still swing from branch to branch in trees find it annoying and wonder when evolution will un-cripple the human DNA and bring back the tail.
Is that what we're talking about here? So in answer to your question.. the K-mount has been considered by some to be crippled for years. That Pentax might "un-crippple" the "crippled" mount for the Full Frame after not doing so for APS-c, is unlikely. But I guess as someone who frets about the "crippled mount" this is your last (or at least latest) desperate kick at the can. Am I reading this right?
The next question is did you violate your non-disclosure agreement by posting this, do you actually have a beta version of the FF and therefore even have a copy of the FF, or are you pretending to have a beta version so you can kick this dead horse one more time. Having failed to mobilize the troops with honest campaigns, maybe a little trickery?
You've put us in a position here where we not only have to decipher your request, but do some serious evaluation of what the reality behind this post is.
I'll be kind and assume you have a Beta FF, aren't allowed to say anything but just couldn't help yourself taking one last shot at the "crippled mount " thing. A man so consumed by his passion non-disclosure agreements mean nothing to him. (polite applause for the rebel standing up to the man.)
I'm not sure others will be so benevolent.
But the post over all is so ambiguous, I wouldn't be surprised if there are lot's more interpretations.
Most of us are still thinking "how the hell did this guy get a beta of the FF? How can I do that.?" If there was something else in the post after the words "Beta FF", everyone was too shocked to comprehend.
Last edited by normhead; 03-03-2015 at 09:38 AM.