Originally posted by richmondthefish Please tell us in detail the features Pentax omitted from the 645Z that allowed them to shave off 7+ grand.
---------- Post added 01-16-16 at 12:56 PM ----------
Right, which was the point I was trying to get Wired to understand. If Pentax could figure out how to get a medium format body to share R&D with the APS-C lineup it's certainly isn't out of the question they could do the same with the K1.
Part of it is the shared guts between the two. But the new FF is supposed to have an all new AF matrix, flash system, and more.....so a lot of the subsidy is gone for this new tech. Rioch also have the benefit of additional funds by an APS-C, Q, GR, WR, photo copiers, industrial controllers, etc. etc. So yes, they can subsidize their own 645z and the new FF. But if we look at history, the K3 vs D7100 for example... at launch the specs were very similar, but the K3 was the more expensive (slightly) camera. So I wouldn't rule out the FF still being more expensive if they are punching in the D810/5Dmk3 class of cameras.
anyways differences from 645z vs Phase One IQ250.
Phase One:
Better dealer support
better after sales support
Capture One Pro included with constant updates
tethering
better manufacture support
16 bit vs 14 bit
flash sync speed upto 1/2000" (vs 1/80") with leaf shutter lenses
leaf shutter lenses
modular tech solution (backs/cameras etc.)
4 year base warranty
new and updated lenses
integrated triggering of Profoto lights
and thats just off the top of my head. Pentax has weather sealing and a more traditional DSLR setup.
Think of it this way.... why buy a Audi A4 when you can get a VW Jetta. they have all the same tech don't they? So why is one more than double the price? Oh yea... advanced features, better manufacture support, better warranty...etc. etc.
Don't get me wrong, the 645z is a VERY nice camera. And having shot with both an IQ250 and a 645z in the past year I was very impressed with both. However, as a strobist, who has NO dealer support for Priolite anywhere near him.... I would never choose the 645z as the tool of choice for my photography. Yes, the 645z is easier to use coming from DSLR's, and it's a great too. But at this price point it's the right tool for the right job. Does this justify 10,000 vs 20,000? Depends on what your shooting I guess.... If your a landscape travel photographer who wants medium format... probably the 645z is a wiser way to spend your money. If your a studio fashion photographer... chances are the Pentax is lacking in all the areas you need.