Why do I have this incredible sense of deja vu when I review this thread.
The big question might be:
What does this thread provide that its predecessors did not?
More words? Better phrasing? More convincing assertions?
Would the comments be more enlightening had the title been:
"K-3 So What Does APS-C Provide Over A FF DSLR?"
-or
"K-3 So What Does APS-C Provide Over Micro 4/3rds?"
-or-
"Hasselblad 500C So What Does 6x6cm Provide over 35mm Film"
-or-
"Murals So What Does Building Format Provide Over Hangable Canvas?"
-or
"Oranges So What Does Citrus Provide Over Pomes?"
There are many more variations on the theme complicated by the fact that my phone camera is superior to my K-3 because it will post to FB automagically and that I prefer to make my coffee in a French Press and don't own a Koerig.
Does any of the above make sense? Do we have to figure seed size variation in determining equivalence between apples and oranges and will it apply to naval oranges or Asian pears?
Rant over...
Steve