Originally posted by dtmateojr Keep believing that lol! Equivalence will not change facts.
Selectively quoting again? Why don't you quote some things from this thread, in which your... EDIT "interesting"... theories were not-so-gently shown the door (big D is the 'unknown member' in that thread, becuase he was later banned as a troll.)
Link to major fail
Here's how this thread/argument has progressed, btw:
Gallon and quart full of water sit next to each other.
Guy1: As you can see, an Oz of water taken from each of these containers has the same mass and density, so the containers are equally capable of carrying water.
Guy2: What do you mean equally capable? The Gallon container holds more total water.
Guy1: What is this concept of "Total Water?!" Can't you see the individual ounces are EXACTLY THE SAME?
Guy2: Of course, but if you weigh both containers, the Gallon weighs more. It's got more volume, same quality of water inside, means more total water.
Guy1: It weighs more simply because it has MORE OUNCES!
Guy2: Huh?
Guy1: For example if you simply put MORE OUNCES IN the QUART CONTAINER, it would match the gallon in weight! LULZ ROFL! It's about the # of ounces, and the quality of each ounce! You Total water guys kill me!
Guy2: How would that work, exactly, putting more ounces into a quart?
Guy1: Well if such a beast existed maybe denser water maybe, that's all they would have to do and then they would weigh the same!
Guy2: OK... Setting aside the fact that an Oz is volume... couldn't they just put this 'denser water' into the gallon then too?
Guy1: ROFL! You guys!
..etc...
An actual example of that last part:
Originally posted by dtmateojr: An 50Mp E-M5, if such a beast exists, will match the performance of a full frame 5DS at any print size. Sensor size does not matter.
Therefore, equivalence is wrong.
... ^ this imagines a magical or at least yet-to-be-invented pixel with the
current efficiency and performance of the E-M5's current pixel (or maybe even better efficiency, who knows what's being imagined,) but made
smaller to fit 50MP of them into that same micro-four-thirds sensor area.
Why not take these magical yet-to-be-invented pixels and put them into a larger sensor, thus maintaining the same advantage that exists today?
.