After the following the thread to this point it would appear that almost any Pentax user with unlimited funds would love this camera. As with other brands, the viewfinder is better in the FF models, the AF is better in the FF models, there is more resolution in the FF models. What photographer in their right mind would say "No, I don't want any of those things." even if you don't plan to use it a lot, you still would put one on your shelf if some one gave you one. Right now, my guess is, for most of us price is the only issue, and those of us who can afford it, already have it. I took over 1000 images today, none of which would have benefited from using a K-1, all of which benefitted from 24 MP in a crop sensor and 8 frames per second.
Long live my K-3.
(Whenever you want to prove a point on Pentax forums, post a squirrel picture.) See, I don't need a K-1. This is just as good as Ruperts K-1 squirrel images. And don't even try and tell me you want to blow your squirrel images up to 40x60 and you'll be able to see a difference. I won't be buying that line of reasoning.
But I have lots of cameras on my shelf I don't use every day or even once a year. It's not a big deal. If I had it, I'd use it. Is there really someone different than that? I mean come on folks, we're here because we are camera aficionados, no?
Is there really someone who's going to say "If I had it I'd give it away?"
For someone to say "It wasn't worth it." , the only way I'm buying that is if they missed three mortgage payments because they bought it and lost their house.