Originally posted by uday029 So I am not correct in saying that f2.8 lens on FF is not f 2.8 on APSC purely in terms of DOF? Again, I am talking this in terms of how the photography industry is wanting me to believe what a particular f-stop can do - i.e, create beautiful photos with blurred background or have everything in focus.
.
No. It is again this mixing of apples and oranges that leads to all the confusion about this topic.
A max aperture of say 2.8 do not refer to DOF but the focal lenght of the lens divided by the lens max opening. Hence 2.8 is 2.8 by definition regardless of lens.
Aperture control the light intensity.
The photo industry have claimed nothing but this.
When you use different formats you'll tend to use different focal lenghts for the same angle of view. Different focal lenghts have different DOF. That's it.
Theres no rule or law thats says what DOF you should have at F: 2.8 at any angle of view.
DOF is a secondary issue of aperture just like motion blur is a secondary issue of shutter speed, but neither DOF or motion blur is involved in the definitions of aperture, shutterspeed, ISO, reciprocity or the stop system. It is all about exposure.