Originally posted by fiddlefye I've recently got back into Pentax via a LX and a group of K and M lenses that came my way. I've been shooting Nikon film (for decades) and full-frame digital (for several years) and using my manual focus glass is pretty much the same experience in both instances. I'm wondering how well the older manual focus K mount lenses work out on full frame Pentax?
I have a fairly extensive kit of Pentax glass ranging from 15mm up to 600mm, mostly A series, some M and K series. My experience is that the wider lenses suffer more and more from vignetting, with my A15/3.5 having around a stop and a half at the edges. The longer lenses are fine, anything from around 28mm and up won't show vignetting under normal pictorial circumstances. The A20/2.8 and A24/2.8 are good as long as they are stopped down one or more stops. As for sharpness, I have no complaints with any of the Pentax lenses. Full disclosure, I'm a pictorialist, not a pixel peeperist, so take that comment for what it's worth.
Having said that, what I was more or less satisfied with regarding my much loved 50mm lenses until I got the D FA 50/1.4. I very quickly became very dissatisfied with my older lenses at that point.
Watch out for the lenses that advertise the FREE optical formula. They can be prone to sensor reflections.
---------- Post added Jan 16th, 2020 at 11:21 AM ----------
Originally posted by rml63 I asked a question about sekonic meters in the lighting forum, but since we are sort of on the subject of metering. Do any of you guys use an external light meter? I shoot all manual lens on my K1 and while I agree there is a lot of range, the idea of taking several readings from a landscape scene and having the meter average them sure sounds appealing .
Mike
I have a Zone VI modified Pentax spot meter that I use from time to time. I use it exactly the same way I used it when I shot 4x5 film, I meter the brightest part of the scene I want to hold detail, set it at Zone VIII or IX and take the picture.