Originally posted by lesmore49 Bit of a dilemma, pretty well most have in the western world. All devices using fossil fuel are going to be banned from use...by...some countries say 2030, 2035, 2040...and with the Glasgow conference I wouldn't be surprised if at the end of the conference , a number of governements will be falling all over each other to accelerate those dates.
So then we have the common man. Speaking from my burg in Western Canada, we have a natural gas powered furnace, which we got in 1995. We have very long winters, almost half the year, where temps dip into the -30 and colder range, regularly. NG prices have gone up, much of it by our feds.
With such an old furnace we know that the end can't be too far off. But then what...do we replace the furnace with a NG furnace or electric heat ? Well, in normal times I would get another NG furnace. But given the 'climate'...political mostly...why get a new, expensive NG furnace when we may only be able to use it for another ten years. So electric baseboard will probably be the choice.
In the prairies, we don't have country bus service, we don't have passenger trains...our public transportation is...our personal vehicle. Distances are far between villages, towns, cities out here. It is very cold, We don't have (yet) much in the way of charging infrastructure. When the temp is -30, the EV vehicle battery ...which provides defrosting cabin heater...and motive power...all from the EV batteries can lose electic power significantly...in our extreme cold...40 % from the published range...I have read.
We drive 700 to 900 miles to visit relatives in Alberta....a number of times a year. EV range and charging times...are still significant issues...for travel out here. We don't live in mild climate city such as Vancouver, LA, etc.
So my point is....out here in flyover country where the buffalo roam (still do in parts)....I do know electric is the new deal....but surely there should be a bridging time, a time to bring up infrastructure to a satisfactory level, a time to allow engineers to figure out how to increase range, significantly shorten charging times, deal with extreme cold weather ....in areas that have cold winters...such as the northern states...from Idaho to NY....and much of (not all) of Canada. Not just a relentless race to replace an old system with a new system...when so many factors , as per I've mentioned in this post, don't seem to be dealt with in a well planned manner.
Engineers and techs will always figure a way and will do so, in this switchover...but give them the time they need.
So I think there is some misinformation regarding phasing out use of fossil fuels.
What is being proposed isn't an outright ban that would immediately take hundreds of millions of vehicles out of service.
What is being proposed is ending production of new vehicles, which are equipped with fossil fueled engines, sometime in the next ten to twenty years.
Guys like you and I will likely not live to see the day when there isn't a service station to fill up that gas guzzler.
So take solace in knowing that even though there will be change, it isn't going to happen overnight, and someday you might see Racer drive through Winnipeg in his Datsun.
Then, one day, it will be like this: