Originally posted by jgirl57 Doundounba- those are the exact kind of macro I want to do !!! What lens are you using for those? I have not figured out how to do that kind of macro yet LOL but I am trying.
Awesome capture.. I noticed I have less spiders in my house when I have my macro lens in my hand LOL
If you go to Flickr, I almost always put lens info in the description of my shots. The crocus-and-fly shot doesn't
really qualify as a macro - it was done with a Helios 44K-4 with a short extension tube. The jumping spider shot is definitely a macro. With the crop, it's probably around 3:1
macro magnification. It was shot using an HD DA 55-300mm zoom plus a Raynox MSN-202 diopter, which is an unusual combo for me. Anyway, the point is that, at least in Montreal where I live, the jumping spiders that live on houses are
really small. Frustratingly so, especially when your shots wind up compared with those of people shooting much larger jumpers. Whereas I can get a pretty good phidippus shot at, say 1.7:1 (
example), because these are 9-12mm spiders, a small circa-5mm zebra jumper or an even smaller Sitticus (or juvenile zebra) requires a lot more magnification to get a decent shot. A lot more than the typical 1:1 macro lens can deliver.
Near 1:1 (the typical macro lens) you'll get something like this (my very first jumping spider photo, using a Pentax-M 50mm F/4 Macro plus extension tubes):
But just yesterday, using a Pentax-M 150mm F/3.5 plus a reversed Vivitar 28mm F/2.8 (and a flash), I got this slightly more interesting shot of a similar spider: