Originally posted by iCrop I have, and use, both the K-3 and D800 for landscapes. They both produce nice images, though the D800 has more detail. I prefer to use the K-3 (or any of my Pentax DSLRs) to the Nikon. The counter-clockwise lens mount, needlessly complex menu system and poor dust removal system make it less than pleasant for me to use. On a recent trip I found dust spots all over the D800 images and I hadn't even changed the lens. The images taken with the K-3 and K-5 were all clean, and I'd changed their lenses a couple times. All 3 cameras had been cleaned, and checked, before the trip. The D800 takes great landscapes with a Zeiss 21mm though.
If you're seriously thinking of getting a D800, rent one for a week. It'll take a few days to figure out the menus, and then you can determine if you like it.
BTW - The K-3 is too new, it won't be replaced for a year or so.
Order the K3 with grip and card this morning before going to work, too good a deal to miss from B&H.
In my country I can get the K3 with the stock lens for about 300$ more, and that is without the battery grip and card..
Am mostly looking forward to use the autofocus and hoping the the viewfinder is a bit bigger ;-) also with out the antialiasing filter, the pictures should be sharper.
But... If Pentax comes out this fall with a full frame. I will come knocking on your door
)))))
Joking aside, thanks for your and everyone's input. It is nice to be able to go on a forum like this, where mostly friendly people can guide you in ones addiction ;-)
As I live in a very small country (48000 people) and far away from the mainland Europe, it is so nice to be able to go and ask questions here, although I don't post much, I check this forum nearly everyday, and all your guys opinions about camera and lenses I value a lot, as I don't have the chance to test/ try cameras here.
My one exception was the 50-135 2.8 that I was able to try in Germany.
Have a nice day you all.